Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only IDD can deliver.
  • Investment Dealers' Digest one-month trial subscription
  • IDDMagazine.com one-month trial subscription
  • Free e-newsletters
  • Free whitepapers

It's A Deal

Smooth Sailing. Right?

It was just a few weeks back that a handful of investment banks -- Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley and Bear Stearns among them -- went public with bold pronouncements that the worst of the credit market shellacking seems to be behind us.

They may be right; after all, who should know better than the folks who are knee-deep in it? But there's a real chance they're not right, and the end result could finish up looking worse than the original debacle. Remember, there's a reason your doctor always tells you to finish off your antibiotics when you're sick. You may think you're cured after taking half your dose, but if the infection comes back, it's often worse than the first go-round.

A couple of things got me thinking about this (besides a bad head cold). First, the Fed on Tuesday released the minutes from its Sept. 18 FOMC meeting where the central bankers decided to cut the fed funds rate by half a point. I've always viewed the release of the minutes as an overblown event, curious why the stock market would so eagerly anticipate looking at Fed sentiment through its rear-view mirror.

But in this instance, a look at the thought process behind the unexpectedly large rate cut seemed appropriate, and one sentence in particular stood out: "Given the unusual nature of the current financial shock, participants regarded the outlook for economic activity as characterized by particularly high uncertainty...."

And speaking of uncertainty, we turn to Goldman Sachs' third-quarter 10-Q, the one that says the firm's "level 3" assets -- those so illiquid that they're close to impossible to value accurately -- rose to $72 billion from $54 billion (see related story). That's 7% of the firm's total assets.

When Merrill Lynch earlier this month preannounced a whopping third-quarter loss -- on a $4.5 billion writedown related to subprime debt and CDOs -- the stock got a 2.5% bump. That's a sign investors think Merrill has wiped its slate clean and has indeed put its credit exposure to bed. To see a stock rise like that in the face of seemingly bad news -- in the belief the "worst is over" -- is not at all uncommon. It's also not always right.

Recent Posts

PE's Forecast

If the clouds would just go away for more than a day, perhaps the summer will arrive in time to give dealmakers a break from the M&A industry’s perfect storm.

A Day For The Ages

A Dow Jones Industrial Average with no Citi and no GM? No surprise, but somehow it still hurts.

Starting Small May Lead To Something Big

Despite the ever-mushrooming number of independent M&A advisory boutiques, it doesn’t take a genius to realize that the middle-market dealmaking landscape has changed.

It's A Joke, Right?

How can the consortium offer for GM's Saturn Distribution Corp., announced by a mysterious private equity firm named Black Oak Partners, be taken seriously?

Index of Posts

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Money Management Executive, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Tom Granahan

Tom Granahan is the Editor of IDD. He has more than 15 years of financial-journalism experience, having written about the stock market for Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal for several years. He also supervised the Newswires' U.S. bureaus, and was the founding editor of Dow Jones Market Talk, which some consider to be one of the earliest forms of financial-news blogging. He graduated with a BA in journalism from Temple University in his hometown of Philadelphia.